Thursday, May 27, 2010

Our Steel Resolution


It is the time that all the people of Burma must demonstrate the will of anti-military dictatorial system with boycotting the 2010 Election together with elected-parties including the NLD and ethnic parties in order to prevent the military junta from coming up with legitimacy for enduring a military rule.

All the people including students and youths,

We, All Burma Monks’ Alliance, 88 Generation Students and All Burma Federation of Student
Unions, seriously request for your actions of boycott the 2010 Election by:
(a) No voting
(b) No advanced voting
(c) Making your vote null if being forced to vote.

All Burma Monks’ Alliance
88 Generation Students
All Burma Federation of Student Unions







Reference:
http://abfsu.net/

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Five Years Added to Student Leader's Sentence

By Ba Kaung (May 25, 2o10)

Kyaw Ko Ko made three dramatic escapes, but his luck finally ran out in 2008, when Burmese authorities arrested him for his role in the 2007 Saffron Revolution and he was sentenced to three years in prison for possesing illegal videos.

On Friday, with his first sentence set to expire in one year, the junta tacked on an additional five years for illegal asociation and subversion.

Kyaw Ko Ko delivers a speech to students in Rangoon during the 2007 Saffron Revolution.

Rahul Kyaw Kyaw Maung, alias Kyaw Ko Ko, 28, is the son of school teachers in Rangoon's Tamwe township. In 2006, he was in Rangoon studying for his masters degree in economics when he was recruited by former political prisoners to engage in political activities.

“Though he received some influence from other individuals, he himself is well-read, calm and disciplined,” recalled a political activist who met Kyaw Ko Ko a few years ago.

Kyaw Ko Ko met the prominent 88 Generation Students' leader Min Ko Naing in a monastery, where they were celebrating the anniversary of the student-led uprising in 1988. When Min Ko Naing and other 88 Generation Students' leaders were re-arrested for their protests against the unannounced increase in fuel prices, and many former political prisoners consequently fled Burma for fear of persecution, younger activists like Kyaw Ko Ko stepped in to take a leadership role.

Representing the new generation of activists that has emerged since since the nationwide anti-government uprising in 1988, Kyaw Ko Ko attempted to rejuvenate the Burma Students' Union, which had became active again during the 1988 uprising.

Although not an officially outlawed association, the Students' Union had become virtually illegal since the 1962 military coup, despite the fact that it played an important role in the country's independence struggle.

“At the court on Friday, my brother did not deny that he tried to reorganize the student's organization, but he insisted to the judges that the organization is a legal organization,” said Kyaw Ko Ko's sister.

When the Saffron Revolution broke out, Kyaw Ko Ko continued his dissident leadership role, and after the crackdown on protesting monks, he went into hiding in and around Rangoon.

In October 2007, a house in South Okkalapa township that Kyaw Ko Ko was hiding in was raided. He managed to escape by jumping off the balcony, but some of his friends were arrested.

Later, the police discovered him in a Rangoon monastery where he had been given refuge, but again he managed to escape. He eluded the authorities for a third time when they raided a snack bar in Rangoon's Junction 8 Shopping mall where he was meeting with friends, who were all arrested.

Kyaw Ko Ko fled to Pegu, but returned to Rangoon in early 2008 to launch a no-vote campaign against the referendum over the junta's controversial Constitution. Before the referendum was held, however, he was finally arrested.

The authorities found videos of the 1988 uprising in the place where Kyaw Ko Ko was hiding, and although family members said he had nothing to do with the videos, in 2009 Kyaw Ko Ko was sentenced to three years in jail after being convicted of violating Burma's Video Act, which regulates uncensored videos, and sentenced to three years in jail.

Violation of the Video Act is one of the charges the regime used in handing down a heavy prison sentence to Burma's famous comedian Zarganar, who is currently jailed in a remote prison.

On Friday, following a trial that was not covered by the state-controlled media, Kyaw Ko Ko received an additional five-year jail sentence for unlawful association and subversion, which according to his defense lawyer, Aung Thein, he is alleged to have committed during the monks' protests in 2007.

“He gave a speech to the crowds in 2007 in front of the Rangoon city hall while representing the students, and this entails the first charge of unlawful association. The same fact becomes the basis of the second charge for subversion,” Aung Thein said. “I believe this is nothing but an attempt to lengthen his prison term.”

“I am not frustrated. I will try to survive the prison life,” Kyaw Ko Ko told his sister during his Rangoon court appearance last week.

The 2007 Saffron Revolution saw the arrest and incarceration of other young activists in Burma, such as blogger Nay Phone Latt and hip-hop singer Zay Yar Thaw, who joined their activist predecessors in jails across the country.

And 2007 was not the first time Burma's young activists have been persecuted following the 1988 uprising. In 1998, many young dissidents were arrested and given long prison sentences, some exceeding 50 years. Many of these activists are still behind bars, according to the Thailand-based Association of Assistance for Political Prisoners in Burma (AAPP).

Currently, while the regime is preparing to hold Burma's first election in twenty years, more than 2000 political prisoners are estimated to be in jails across the country. Under the regime's election laws, all of them are barred from the voting process and do not have the right to be a member of any political party.

“My brother is against the election this year. He has no faith in this at all,” Kyaw Ko Ko's sister said.


Reference:

Kaung, Ba. Five Years Added to Student Leader's Sentence. The Irrawaddy. May 25 2010. http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=18554&page=2


Tuesday, May 18, 2010

USDA's hypocracy

This picture corresponds exactly what USDA (Union Solidarity and Development Association) is doing.

Reference:

Lay, Harn. Disciplined Democracy's Dry Run. The Irrawaddy. May 18, 2010.

Friday, May 7, 2010

Fighting Peacock Flag is our emblem

Fighting Peacock Flag is an ABFSU's emblem and was a NLD's flag. It was and must be used solely by students of ABFSU but should not be used for any political purposes: good or bad.

I, as a student activist from ABFSU, condemn both Ye Htun of "FAKE" 88 Generation Student Union of Myanmar (GSUM) and Aye Lwin of Union of Myanmar Federation of National Politics (UMFNP). Since both of you are students of 88 Generation, you should have known that it is strongly prohibited to used for any benefit. And I believe both of you have become military dogs after being put behind bars. I also conclude that your intentions of using our emblem is detrimental.

If you believe in yourselves, you can create and use your own. DO NOT USE OUR FIGHTING PEACOCK FLAG AT ANYTIME, YOU IMPOSTORS!!!



Feathers Fly Over Use of Fighting Peacock Image

By Ko Htwe (May 7 2010)

Feathers are flying in Burma over the use of the fighting peacock emblem by two newly registered political parties in their election campaigns.

The emblem—famously associated with the now disbanded National League for Democracy (NLD)—has served as a national symbol since the days of the Burmese monarchy and was a rallying image brandished by student activists in colonial times.

“It's not appropriate to use the student movement's flag as the symbol of a political party,” said prominent journalist Ludu Sein Win, one of a group of about 40 people in the Burmese media world who signed a letter of complaint to the Election Commission.

“The fighting peacock symbol is not the property of a certain organization and it is associated with all Burmese nationals,” said Ludu Sein Win.

The Election Commission has ruled that it will accept objections against the use of flags or symbols by registered political parties.

The fighting peacock symbol is being used by two newly registered parties, the Union of Myanmar Federation of National Politics (UMFNP) and the 88 Generation Student Union of Myanmar (GSUM), led by two brothers who are former political prisoners. The two are the subjects of unsubstantiated suspicions that they are collaborating with the regime.

Objectors point out that the fighting peacock symbol adopted by the two new parties is similar to the one used by the All Burma Federation of Student Unions (ABFSU), which played a key role in Burma's independence movement against British colonial rule.

Since the 1962 military coup, the ABFSU has been viewed by successive regimes as an illegal organization. Its building on the Rangoon University campus was destroyed in a bomb attack in the year of the coup.

The ABFSU objected to the use of the peacock symbol when it was first adopted by the the now-defunct NLD and used in its party flag, but later dropped its objection.

“The ABFSU flag is being used only in the movement led by students, handed down from one generation to another,” said Myo Myint Nyein, of the Rangoon-based weekly journal The Ray of Light. “I don't agree with using it as the image of a party.”

GSUM chairman Ye Tun said his party and the UMFNP were only trying to trying to preserve the image of the fighting peacock.

The group of objectors agreed in their letter to the Election Commission that the symbol was “crucial for the history of the nation” but said “it should not be the property of any political party.”

Among the signatories of the letter of complaint was Maung Wun Tha, a veteran writer and editor who was a member of the ABFSU before 1962.

Reference:

Htwe, Ko. Feathers Fly Over Use of Fighting Peacock Image . The Irrawaddy. May 7 2010. http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=18419

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Thein Sein, if you have done nothing wrong and believe in yourself, what are you afraid of?


Burma’s censorship board is keeping a tight control on reporting in private journals about the junta’s Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) led by Prime Minister Thein Sein. Journalists in Rangoon said the censorship board, the Press Scrutiny and Registration Division under the Ministry of Information, does not allow any questioning on the controversial formation of the USDP, which was formed directly from the state mass organization, the Union Solidarity and Development Association (USDA). -- Irrawaddy

Again... Why is Thein Sein afraid off? Is he frightened that people might be focussing on his corruptions? Why is the Censorship Board preventing journalists to write critical comments although Thein Sein is no longer a Military official?

Answers to these questions are obvious. Although the War Office announced that Thein Sein's retirement, he is still acting as a Premier without a doubt. His party USDP, which is hated by citizens the most, involved in beating monks in Saffron Revolution. The corruptions in this election will be evident by the victory of USDP.

Hopefully, United Nations would not approve the outcome of this election. If UN or the World's Nations approve the result of election, it means that these Nations approve the massacre of Saffron Revolution in September 2007 and these nations will have proved themselves to be the same as Burmese junta.

Reference:
Moe, Wai. Tight Censorship on Reporting USDP. The Irrawaddy. May 5 2010. http://www.irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=18388

Burmese Generals deceive US Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs


WASHINGTON — Speaking at a daily press briefing on Tuesday, the assistant secretary of state for public affairs, P J Crowley, suggested that if Burmese generals resigned from the military to contest the upcoming election, this could be seen as a positive step.

Even Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs was deceived by the sly actions of Military Junta. Do you really believe these Burmese generals resigned for good or for the well-being of Burma? Of course not!

These generals are resigning because they have to cope with the unjust rules of 2010 Election written by themselves and because they want other countries to think they have become innocent. Even prime minister, Thein Sein, has stood down from his super position to take part in 2010 Election. If this is not the greediness, then what is it?

One thing for sure is that these resignations are not POSITIVE in all senses!


Reference:
Jha, Lalit K. Generals Resignation for Election May Be Positive. Irrawaddy. May 5 2010 http://www.irrawaddy.org/


Wednesday, May 5, 2010

The annihilations of Democracy Icons in Burma

NLD has been forced to disbanded. Ms. Suu Kyi is still under house-arrest. Students and opposing politicians expressing their views are put into jails.

If you ask where Democracy is now, I am very confident to say that it does not exists in Burma. Burmese military junta is trying its best to brush off any obstructions for them from the surface of the earth. By obstructions, I am referring to Democracy icons such as the peacock flag, Ms. Suu Kyi, NLD, and so on.

Although NLD is dissolved by force, the peacock flag which is a representative of our student body and a Democracy Icon, will vanish by no means, and we will protect our peacock flag with all our hearts!!!

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Dirty laws of Burma Election 2010

The National League for Democracy (NLD) will cease to exist as a political movement after the deadline for party registration on May 6, according to NLD Central Executive Committee (CEC) members. The Burmese opposition party refused to re-register for this year's general election, saying the election laws were “unfair and unjust.”

-- Irrawaddy

Unfortunately, NLD had fallen into the dirty tricks of Military Government. With NLD's declaration of refusal to take part in the election, Military Government immediately announced a new rule for the election -- "all parties which took part in 1990 election must register for 2010 election or they will be disbanded".

What an "unfair and unjust" move! Like I speculated, this Military junta has always been craving to wipe out the name "NLD" from the surface of the earth.

Students, monks, and opposing political parties are the only groups which dare to express their beliefs towards everything, and thus are targets of this cruel regime. DON'T FORGET that a lot of students had been massively annihilated since 1988 uprising, monks were beaten to death in September 2008, and politicians, especially from NLD, are still in jail.

Is this what Democracy is? Definitely not!!! This is a pure dictatorship of the suppressive regime which always wants to clear anything in its way.


Reference:

Htwe, Ko. NLD Will Cease To Exists. The Irrawaddy. May 1, 2010 http://www.irrawaddy.org/